because I do not in principle feel comfortable talking about things that are not things, and realities that are not realities. And because I relate to exhaust systems and the most exalted pride
By relying on there Buddhas 'enlightened', "awake" create an air of superiority over the "not awake", "unenlightened", those in a lower cycle of reincarnation. Those who "have covered the receipt by a soft veil of ignorance." The "only that I know nothing" Socrates loses its great capacity to learn to become the highlight "is more, the more you think everything is ignorance."
Assigning an awakening to the truth, in essence, is a "truth" that no one can know more than the enlightened.
Relative and absolute time, which is why I think it is merely a "true utility" as the de Unamuno "Everything is relative but relative is relativity itself. Then everything is absolute but becomes relative to others. " In my belief system is scientific truth, like the Alfred Tarski where "the truth is the extent to which the proposals relate to the reality that concern."
And that's where it takes the concept of reality. That of the Buddhists is something like to "all that is, whether or not visible, accessible or understandable by science and philosophy or any other system of analysis."
The eternal tug of war between idea and matter. Historical experience has shown us that much more progress when the mind is focused on understanding the known even with mathematical logic in speculating about the unknown. I like to think as Philip Dick "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, does not go away."
By tracing the root of suffering and in need of, if any, to possess, to desire, to adhere . Renounce human nature, creating a fictitious "Spiritual nature" instead of affirming the daily struggle for existence, renounce her inactivity devoid of punctures. The phrase is something like holding little children "to order that neither wanted." Very different from "I want something," "believe in something and somebody." Very different to expect change orders established that are adverse "tangible reality."
The "correct understanding" (samyak dristi) implies that to be correct, the others can be "no right" (Syndrome escape from reality).
The concept of past lives I've always associated with escape as a form of "not dying" as a way to escape human frailty and see that we only have one opportunity to do things well and enjoy what we have.
Although they say it is a journey and not a religion. Moreover
Buddhism seems to me equally absurd and sublime than any other religion.
By relying on there Buddhas 'enlightened', "awake" create an air of superiority over the "not awake", "unenlightened", those in a lower cycle of reincarnation. Those who "have covered the receipt by a soft veil of ignorance." The "only that I know nothing" Socrates loses its great capacity to learn to become the highlight "is more, the more you think everything is ignorance."
Assigning an awakening to the truth, in essence, is a "truth" that no one can know more than the enlightened.
Relative and absolute time, which is why I think it is merely a "true utility" as the de Unamuno "Everything is relative but relative is relativity itself. Then everything is absolute but becomes relative to others. " In my belief system is scientific truth, like the Alfred Tarski where "the truth is the extent to which the proposals relate to the reality that concern."
And that's where it takes the concept of reality. That of the Buddhists is something like to "all that is, whether or not visible, accessible or understandable by science and philosophy or any other system of analysis."
The eternal tug of war between idea and matter. Historical experience has shown us that much more progress when the mind is focused on understanding the known even with mathematical logic in speculating about the unknown. I like to think as Philip Dick "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, does not go away."
By tracing the root of suffering and in need of, if any, to possess, to desire, to adhere . Renounce human nature, creating a fictitious "Spiritual nature" instead of affirming the daily struggle for existence, renounce her inactivity devoid of punctures. The phrase is something like holding little children "to order that neither wanted." Very different from "I want something," "believe in something and somebody." Very different to expect change orders established that are adverse "tangible reality."
The "correct understanding" (samyak dristi) implies that to be correct, the others can be "no right" (Syndrome escape from reality).
The concept of past lives I've always associated with escape as a form of "not dying" as a way to escape human frailty and see that we only have one opportunity to do things well and enjoy what we have.
Although they say it is a journey and not a religion. Moreover
Buddhism seems to me equally absurd and sublime than any other religion.
0 comments:
Post a Comment