Can I Upholster A Lamp Shade

ONE OF A DOWN FAIRY

Why we can not see fairies or fantasy worlds? Does that not exist? Hans
Rothgiesser has another explanation: that we are also another group of fantastic creatures, only used to our magic, and we are the worst of those great civilizations, so we are segregated, with the exception of relating to others, but eventually, our City of Lima is secretly flown by these other worlds that we fear.

Already some weeks after finishing the book by Hans Rothgiesser, his memory was a farmer and in my memory, interacting and trading a place with others, and as Borges would say, going to exercise their exact role in the economy of my universe, and as in all active reading has had a bit of myself. For half a book is merit or fault of the reader. And when it became a memory or reproach is owing me more and more.
is noteworthy that memory space occupied by the varied and wide of the place of the world of the Herald in Barca, and the multitude of characters who appear one after the other, each with its own personality and characteristics, and almost all of his own world that they are the only sign.

the distance as I recall something like a fantasy world had stuck in our ordinary town after a quake-marine accident and the marsh had returned the body is still alive but sick of the more rare a mythical human.
the android in Blade Runner recalls memories embedded in it, reading is insert a stranger in a mental world. So you have to choose carefully what you read, and that's very wise to read the Herald on Barca. That
wide and complicated world was coming to a few in my mind, was one of those solitary pleasures surrounded by people, reading on the buses and vans in the Barca Herald, mysterious name only understood the end, the book became time empty into the details of a bigger universe, including mine. Platonic doctrine says that we do not learn but just remember, so in those places I remembered a fairy fallen from a combination, and walked down the street that maybe I was in front of me. A retired teacher sad, that I think I look very much in a few years and reading about the Herald, Bastian, I felt physically feeling of recognizing someone. Strangely is the most ambiguous and less is revealed, at least directly in the book and that is what most fascinating, and rather than what they say, so shut up (to paraphrase Wittgenstein)
One reads for to experience something that otherwise would not experience. What attracted me to read this piece of my mind now was that mix the fantasy world and the raw Lima, the combination of the two things most others, one's world of anatomy and physical laws and on the other hand, the concrete and near Lima, that boldness drew me in and agitated, as the imminent fall on a roller coaster, and like all things new slope to accommodate it. But what else can attract intellectual explorers? Lima
missing for years, talk to strangers about my desire for this city and said that Lima was like a huge maze that Limeños learned not to lose, but that any other would be lost, that Lima was so big, unknown and rare that if you wanted it you could find even a unicorn. Add theatrically that Lima was all and it was nothing.
did not know that in the remote, and in parallel to my words and emotions of that night, a book and I was waiting on a shelf of a bookstore should be closed, to let me know much later, sorry to remember that it was true. Luis Arbaiza

http://luisarbaizaescalante.blogspot.com/

"El Heraldo in the boat is on sale in bookstores Crucible, The Viceroy, La Casa Verde, La Familia, Latin and Zeta Bookstore, between others.

Can You Take A Snooker Cue On As Hand Luggage

COMBI 30 reasons to NOT vote for K. Fujimori

Why:
1.-Fujimori was re-elected 3 times. 2 .- Mato
more people than Pinochet and Videla together
3.-Rafael King, ultrahomofobo is vice president of Keiko Fujimori, Marta Chaves is evangelical, homophobic too.

4.-The Fujimori government
theft like never before was a narco 5 .- 6 .-
been sold to multinational country which even did not pay royalty fees or destroyed
7 .- purposely education, taking it to last place in Latin America, they test the degree of brutalization of the Peruvian current, are illiterate or just 8 .-
professionals with full labor rights, normal now work 12 hours (illegal throughout the world) for 800 soles.
9 .- corrupted politicians and judges all
10 .- destroy the freedom of the press.

11.-because Keiko is surrounded by exactly the same people who Fujimori, has his own plan of government and visitors.

12.-Humala is accused of having as an adviser to Chavez Lula possibly even more but who advises Keiko?: Fujimori and Vladimiro.

13 .- Practical torture and extrajudicial killing

14 .- exclusion would be tremendous social, poverty reached 50% of the population

15 .- There were reports of missing 5.000 16 .-

closed an opposition television channel.

17 .- April 7, 2009, Fujimori was sentenced to 25 years in prison in order to crimes of murder with malice, aggravated kidnapping and serious injuries
18 .- On July 20, 2009 Fujimori was sentenced to an additional 7 ½ years in prison for being found guilty of willful embezzlement, misappropriation of funds and falsification against the State.
hill congress 19.-20 .- fire
a Bank headquarters of the Nation, died 6 employees
21 Montesinos, was his most trusted advisor.

22 Fujimori at the end thanked the services of Montesinos, and gave him $ 15 million as compensation to Montesinos. 23
José Ugaz, sought and obtained a freeze on the accounts of Fujimori clan abroad: $ 140 million in Switzerland, 64 in the Cayman Islands, 20 in the U.S. and some 4 million in other countries, as well as 18 million Peru itself.
24 In 2004, the NGO Transparency International estimated at about $ 600 million illegally amassed wealth by Fujimori during the ten years he was in power. 25
think the services, facilities explitacion, the tell you the mode Services without any benefit personalessin not
26

sterilized without consent 27 For that keiko was silent when his father sent his mother tortured with electric shocks Susana Higuchi, after she denounced the torture Susana, Keiko will just say that its mother was "crazy"

28 Keiko financed their studies in the U.S. with money stolen from the state, Montesinos said on July 19, 2001 before the supreme fiscal ye lay Gladys, current Attorney General, studies paid Keiko, Hiro, Sachi and Kenji Fujimori, the four sons of former President Alberto Fujimori (1990-2000) with money Intelligence Service (SIN).

29 For you have to choose between two doors, one could have a lion (Humala) and the other surely there is a Leon (keiko). 30 Why

postulate with 3 investigated for drug trafficking and money laundering, first Keiko Fujimori and his party did not sign the "Oath of Ethics against the infiltration of drug trafficking," sponsored by the National Commission to Combat Drugs, the government agency counternarcotics to be signed by participants in the elections.
got Jose "Pepe" Vasquez, the Narcotics Police investigating his alleged close Vasquez relationship with the Peruvian drug kingpin Augusto Arriaga. Arriaga is wanted by the police, accused of heading a mafia involved in Colombia and Mexico and is dedicated to the export of cocaine.

Karina Beteta investigated by the Fourth Criminal Court of Lima Office for alleged money laundering from drug trafficking.
Juan Almonacid, the Provincial Prosecutor's Bolognesi, in the North Andean department of Ancash, opened an investigation for alleged drug trafficking and money laundering by the successive discoveries of drugs in the holds of the buses in your company and belongings of passengers. Keiko finally admitted on television that the family of businessman fishing investigated Eudocio "Olluquito" Martinez contributed to his 2006 campaign.

Grandes Tetas Groping

The century of individualism: "happiness machines" Carl Gustav Jung

They say it's a cult film. See why.

http://danielpoblete.bligoo.com/content/view/540288/El-siglo-del-individualismo-maquinas-de-felicidad.html

Curtains Matching With Green Walls

- Unconscious

Neutering Boston Terriers

Difference between Religion and Spirituality

* Religion is not only one, but hundreds. * Spirituality is one. * Religion is for those who want to follow the ritual and formality. * Spirituality is for those who want to achieve spiritual ascent without dogmas. * Religion is for sleeping. * The Spirituality is for those awake. * Religion is for those who need someone else telling them what to do, they want to be guided. * Spirituality is for those who lend ear to your inner voice. * Religion is a set of dogmatic rules and unquestionable that has followed without protest. * Spirituality invites you to reason everything, question everything and decide your actions, accept the consequences. * Religion threats and intimidation. * Spirituality gives you peace of mind. * Religion speaks of sin and guilt. * Spirituality tells you that you passed, do not get pricked by what has already happened. Rather get up and learn from error. * Religion represses it all makes you fake. * Spirituality is above all, makes you true. * Religion is inculcated from childhood you like soup you do not want to take. * Spirituality is the food that you yourself are looking for, I am satisfied and happy to the senses. * Religion is not God. * Spirituality is the ALL and therefore is God. * Religion invents. * discover spirituality. * Religion does not ask or question. * Spirituality questions everything. * Religion is human, an organization with rules. * Spirituality is divinity, without rules. * Religion is cause for division. * Spirituality is the cause of union. * Religion wants you to believe. * The spirituality you have to find you. * Religion follows the precepts of a holy book. * Spirituality seeks the sacred in all the books. * Religion feeds on fear. * Spirituality is powered by the trust. * Religion makes you live in thought. * Spirituality makes you live in consciousness. * Religion is concerned with doing. * Spirituality is concerned with the SER. * Religion is logical. * Spirituality is dialectical * Religion feed you ego. * Spirituality makes you transcend logic. * Religion makes you renounce the world. * Spirituality in God makes you live, do not give him * Religion is worship. * Spirituality is meditation. * Religion is to remain part of the psychology of the masses. * The Spirituality is individuality. * Religion dreams of glory and paradise. * Spirituality makes you live here and now. * Religion lives in the past and the future. * spirituality lives in the present, the here and now. * Religion is a closure in your memory. * Spirituality is freedom in consciousness. * The religion believes in eternal life. * Spirituality makes you aware of it. * Religion gives you (promise) to after death. * Spirituality gives you the light to find God within you, in this life, at present, in the here and now. Cesar Morey - http://www.facebook.com/l/b3e6c; www.superacionpersonal.org

One Red Lump On Back Of Throat

The Island of Flowers The Celestine Prophecy Movie

documentary that shows how people, human beings must eat the food unfit for pigs!. Moral ... "Be the change you want to see in the World."

Does Neilmed Have Zinc In It?

Not good sanctify Juan Pablo II (The Devil's Advocate)

The disappearance of the figure of the "devil's advocate" in the canonization process. The Vatican bureaucracy has taken an increasingly critical element to events and actions in case they are charged to the same obedience obedience. Religion as a fundamental aspect of people who have decided to follow it, should be a source of hope, strength and internal growth in reverence to a god, not limitation in obedience irrational and even less when creating role models to imitate, such as the figures of saints.

The figure of the devil's advocate as "questioning" of the sanctity of the "new saints" should be fundamental. But has ceased to be, but we all know is different, the leadership and bureaucracy to the parish church and the people forming a church. Like many facts of everyday life the establishment of a "processed" or "law" does not solve the compliance or need and less convinced of the rightness of his background.

could make a thorough analysis of each of the decisions that have led to the altar many questionable figures of recent times. But why do it? It really is a debate that generates fertility. Not in all cases, even creates barren land in the vast majority, as radical and makes ideas contrary to the most radicalization are accepted excuse or chase.

But in the case of Karol Wojtyla, is my view point to be discussed at least in the people of the church but "the leadership" has already presented as a fait accompli.

The reasons are many and only set out the most obvious.

is the historical predecessor, administrative and ideological current state of things both in the Catholic religion, "official" as in many Western countries influenced by the same religion. Even Wojtyla's successor whoever he authorizes the title of "holiness" is not an accolade given to other himself, being a minister Ratzinger critical in this administration?

There is a lack of administrative crisis of vocations, credibility, support theological belief masses and even questioning the moral authority of the priesthood that extends to the papacy, because of the actions that began and reached its climax in the reign John Paul II.

I do not have the resources that would have a devil's advocate, but there are many questions to answer to the impending canonization of John Paul II, will try to explain briefly some of them.

1) Is not considered a sin of omission, which in their eyes is to develop a network pedophile?. "And even the support of dioceses such as Chicago or Los Angeles. O the founder of the association of "the Legionaries of Christ"?. How many of the times I came to Mexico came to settle financial matters with Maciel?

2) Is it not the responsibility of the figure of the successor of Peter to "order in the churches" that have been linked to money laundering, drug trafficking and other scandals. In the mouth of his own bishops?.

3) is different from tolerance to acceptance, nobody calls the Catholic Church "accepted" behaviors, which are not raised under the microscope of history and theological serious analysis. But does that is different from persecution?. Some ideas and behaviors were openly persecuted and treated with a kind of zero tolerance, with a very thin border to eradicate by force. As the new ideas of the church itself (Hans Kung), left-wing ideas (liberation theology), as well as Communists, homosexuals.

4) The behavior in the pontificate of John Paul II Do not mean a reversal of the Second Vatican Council? Where they argued that the church and its domes are imbued with the reality that involved living in these times. Was not it a mass pontificate without ideas, that will bring growth of the church in faith and hope?

5) Did not Pope John Paul II policy support end of the Cold War or even logistical and economic development in the fall of socialist states, which later evolved into a tit for tat and growth of mafias?.

6) Is not he a blind eye can do more than lukewarm critical to wildlife actions like the war in Serbia, etc attacks against Muslim countries.?

I do not think that Pope John Paul II is a model of holiness. His behavior sponsored persecution and intolerance. Too much "media" asked to build an image of "good father" but better a stern father to protect their children to a "soft" to allow the violation of their children. John Paul II was not a holy man was a statesman, perhaps charismatic but nothing more.

I think more than ever, humanity needs the smile of God, but I also believe that the church should never have removed the "devil's advocate."

How To Congratulate Friend New Baby

THAT IS LIFE: SUMMARY

Summary
The definition of life is a philosophical and epistemological problem unresolved.
The concept of life, no consensus definition and sufficient. We know that life is indeed a type of physico-chemical phenomenon, a type of matter doing a particular thing, identify what is that thing is why this essay.
Living things can not be beings with a will or autonomous movement, as many living things do not and vice versa. Neither evolution or metabolism would define life as being concepts that depend on the concept of life, not yet. Life as anti-entropy defines a means or instrument of life more than herself.
Other definitions are descriptive and not explanatory.
Is there a real difference between living and inert or wrong is just a prejudice in our minds?
Thesis: Life physicochemical processes are self-propagating
substances or, life is all that makes a substance to reproduce.
on planet earth seems to have only two substances that trigger self-propagating process. Nucleic acids and prions.
The first living creature was not a cell, but most likely a molecule, RNA, are capable of self-replicating and enzyme may be reproduced and catalyze chemical reactions to do so. We would be only somewhat improved chemical complexes of this initial model and we are different from that first be quantitatively and not qualitatively.
nucleic acids, are the cause, the consequence of life, life is an effect and not a cause, an effect of the existence of matter.
Apparently this reproductive process called life is only a means, not an end, the end is the same as multiplication. Life would be playing the playback.
would be a single category of life, not like now where there are several, would be a sufficient definition, none of them is now, life would be viruses and prions.
living beings that we would be longer matter, as is the music. In a fundamental sense there is nothing in life that distinguishes it from the inert, would be a particular type occur in the inert.
Why is there life and not simply inert beings? Living things must be objects more likely than inert.

Keywords: Life, physicochemical epistemology, anti-entropy, nucleic acids, RNA, definition.

Luis Arbaiza

Afrin Is Burning My Throat

CAN CHANGE THE PAST? REPRODUCTION OF VIABLE MOUSE


Biologist with a major in genetics

UNMSM http://luisarbaizaescalante.blogspot.com/

1927
For quantum physics, there is an influence of the observer or sensor in the world microscopic, photons behave as a wave or particle depending on the observer.
In the double-slit experiment of Thomas Young, single photons are fired at a distant screen, partially blocked halfway by a wall containing two slits.
If not checked by which slit a photon passes, it seems to interfere with itself, it behaves like a wave, traveling through both slits:
But if slots are controlled carefully, the interference disappears, and each photon travels through a single slot, as a particle.
This poses two problems: 1 .-
photons can choose how to behave on the basis of measurements?
2.-If any conceivable source was reporting secretly to the photon, must send a message that was traveling faster than the speed of light, something physically inconceivable from the perspective of the theory of relativity. 3.-
since the photons are traveling in the slot and have already traveled a stretch, this change would seem to affect her past that startup Travel (past) and was in a state of wave or particle
1978
Physicist John Wheeler pointed out that a photon could somehow know in advance the type of observation that would be "subject" and change their behavior to wave or particle accordingly. (journey into the future).
To test this possibility, Wheeler then thought of an experiment in which the decision of the mode of observation of photons was taken only after they have already been cast.

2010
Scientific Laboratory and Molecular Quantum Proton (the French CNRS and the Ecole Normal Superieure de Cachan), have been able to carry out the experiment
What was apparent in this experiment is that the photon appears as a wave when it was decided to observe wave behavior and behaves like a particle when has decided to observe a corpuscular behavior.
The trial delayed as much as possible the choice of the photon live experience, hoping that is within the measuring device, in this case an interferometer with a length of 50 meters. Once inside the device, the researchers randomly selected as they would be made, but apparently the photon behaved as if she already knew.

The last change, to adapt to this set.

problems arise 1.-Why do we think the decision to become a wave or particle is prior to the measure?
As Hawking says: Scientists must accept theories that are consistent with experiments, not with our preconceived notions. BIBLIOGRAPHY


Stephen Hawking. Leonard Mlodinow The Grand Design. Critical. 2010 Barcelona

How Much Would A Dark Weave Cost

(MALE AND FEMALE) OF BOTH PARENTS

,

Deng1 Jian Min, 2 *, Kei Satoh1, 3 *, Hao Chang1, 2.4, Zhaoping Zhang1, M. David Stewart1, Hongren
Wang5, Austin J. Cooney5, and Richard R. Behringer1, 2,3,4 **
1Department of Genetics and 2Center for Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA, 3Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Rice University, Houston
TX 77251, USA; 4 Programme in Genes and Development, The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA; 5Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of
Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
* Both authors contributed equally
Short Title: Generation of viable mice from two parents
Summary Judgement: XO cells pluripotent stem cells derived from XY cells derived somatic differentiated to functional oocytes in women's fantasies, which can be fertilized to produce a normal male and female offspring with alleles taken from two parents.

Grant Support: Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) GM81627 AJC and RRB, and Ben F. Love seat, and the Kleberg Foundation to RRB veterinary animal care was supported by Grant Support Cancer Center NIH CA16672.
** Correspondence and reprint request: Department of Genetics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. Tel: 713-834-6427; Fax: 713-834-6339, Email: rrb@mdanderson.org


Summary
In sexual species, fertilization of oocytes produced out individuals with alleles from both parents. Here we use pluripotent stem cells from somatic cells taken from combining the haploid genomes of two males to produce viable sons and daughters. Cells of male mice (XY) were induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS) (father * 1) were used to isolate sub-populations that had spontaneously lost the Y chromosome to be genetically female (XO). These XO males removed were used to generate female chimeras were bred with males genetically different (parent * 2),
Progeny has the genetic information was taken from both parents.
Thus, functional oocytes can be generated from somatic male cells after a new investment program spontaneous sex. These new findings have implications for reproduction in mammals and reproductive assistance technology. INTRODUCTION


natural couplings between males and females cause the fertilization of oocytes by sperm and the generation of progeny that inherited alleles from both parents. In mammals, embryos generated experimentally produced only oogenesis alleles or only spermatogenesis usually die during development due to imbalances in imprinting.Así gene expression, epigenetic differences scheduled for male and female gametogenesis are required for normal mouse development. Interestingly, viable mice "bi-maternal" women have been generated by nuclear transfer into oocytes [4]. This required the introduction of H19 mutant nuclei oocytes were not in the wild type oocytes crops. The frequency of viable mice from these oocytes reconstructed with genetic information taken from two, is less than 1%.





















BIBLIOGRAFIA

1. McGrath J, Solter Solter D. Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and
paternal genomes. Cell 1984; 37:179-183.
2. Surani MA, Barton SC, Norris ML. Development of reconstituted mouse eggs suggests
imprinting of the genome during gametogenesis. Nature 1984; 308:548-550.
3. Mann JR, Lovell-Badge RH. Inviability of parthenogenones is determined by pronuclei, not
egg cytoplasm. Nature 1984; 310:66-67.
4. Kono T, Obata Y, Wu Q, Niwa K, Ono Y, Yamamoto Y, Park ES, Seo JS, Ogawa H. Birth of
parthenogenetic mice that can develop to adulthood. Nature 2004; 428:860-864.
5. Kawahara M, Wu Q, Takahashi N, Morita S, Yamada K, Ito M, Ferguson-Smith AC, Kono T.
High-frequency generation of viable mice from engineered bi-maternal embryos. Nat Biotechnol
2007; 25:1045-1050.
6. Kawahara M, Kono T. Longevity in mice without a father. Hum Reprod 2010; 25:457-461.
7. Jäger RJ, Anvret M, Hall K, Scherer G. A human XY female with a frame shift mutation in
the candidate testis-determining gene SRY. Nature 1990; 348:452-454.
8. Lovell-Badge R, Robertson E. XY female mice resulting from a heritable mutation in the
primary testis-determining gene, Tdy. Development 1990; 109:635-646.
9. Dumic M, Lin-Su K, Leibel NI, Ciglar S, Vinci G, Lasan R, Nimkarn S, Wilson JD,
McElreavey K, New MI. Report of fertility in woman with predominantly 46,XY karyotype in
family with multiple disorders of sexual development: review of prismatic case. Mt Sinai J Med
2008; 75:168-169.
10. Eicher EM, Washburn LL, Whitney JB 3rd, Morrow KE. Mus poschiavinus Y chromosome
in the C57BL/6J murine genome causes sex reversal.
Science 1982; 217:535-537.
Deng 8
11. Nagamine CM, Taketo T, Koo GC. Studies on the genetics of tda-1 XY sex reversal in the
mouse. Differentiation 1987; 33:223-231.
12. Park EH, Taketo T. Onset and progress of meiotic prophase in the oocytes in the B6.YTIR
sex-reversed mouse ovary. Biol Reprod 2003; 69:1879-1889.
13. Otsuka S, Konno A, Hashimoto Y, Sasaki N, Endoh D, Kon Y. Oocytes in newborn MRL
mouse testes. Biol Reprod 2008; 79:9-16.
14. Bradley A, Evans M, Kaufman MH, Robertson E. Formation of germ-line chimaeras from
embryo-derived teratocarcinoma cell lines. Nature 1984; 309:255-256.
15. Buehr M, Meek S, Blair K, Yang J, Ure J, Silva J, McLay R, Hall J, Ying QL, Smith A.
Capture of authentic embryonic stem cells from rat blastocysts. Cell 2008; 135:1287-1298.
16. Li P, Tong C, Mehrian-Shai R, Jia L, Wu N, Yan Y, Maxson RE, Schulze EN, Song H,
Hsieh CL, Pera MF, Ying QL. Germline competent embryonic stem cells derived from rat
blastocysts. Cell 2008; 135:1299-1310.
17. Feng B, Ng JH, Heng JC, Ng HH. Molecules that promote or enhance reprogramming of
somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2009; 4:301-312.
18. Okita K, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S. Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent
stem cells. Nature 2007; 448:313-317.
19. Eggan K, Rode A, Jentsch I, Samuel C, Hennek T, Tintrup H, Zevnik B, Erwin J, Loring J,
Jackson-Grusby L, Speicher MR, Kuehn R, Jaenisch R. Male and female mice derived from the
same embryonic stem cell clone by tetraploid embryo complementation. Nat Biotechnol 2002;
20:455-459.
20. Kobayashi A, Shawlot W, Kania A, Behringer RR. Requirement of Lim1 for female
reproductive tract development. Development 2004; 131:539-549.
21. Sybert VP, McCauley E. Turner's syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:1227-1238.
22. Russell WL, Russell LB, Gower JS. Exceptional inheritance of a sex-linked gene in the
mouse explained on the basis that the X/O sex-chromosome constitution is female. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 1959; 45:554–560.
23. Cattanach BM. XO mice. Genet Res 1962; 3:487-490.
24. Szabó PE, Hübner K, Schöler H, Mann JR. Allele-specific expression of imprinted genes in
mouse migratory primordial germ cells. Mech Dev 2002; 115:157-160.
25. Nagy A, Gertsenstein M, Vintersten K, Behringer R. Manipulating the mouse Embryo: A
Laboratory Manual, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press;
2003.
26. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and
adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006; 126:663-676.
27. Meissner A, Wernig M, Jaenisch R. Direct reprogramming of genetically unmodified
fibroblasts into pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 2007; 25:1177-1181.
28. O'Gorman S, Dagenais NA, Qian M, Marchuk Y. Protamine-Cre recombinase transgenes
efficiently recombine target sequences in the male germ line of mice, but not in embryonic stem
cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94:14602-14607.
29. Bishop CE, Hatat D. Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of a mouse Y chromosome
RNA transcript expressed in the testis. Nucleic Acids Res 1987; 15:2959-2969.
30. Uchida M, Tokunaga T, Aizawa S, Niwa K, Imai H. Isolation and nature of mouse
embryonic stem cell line efficiently producing female germ-line chimeras. Anim Sci Technol
(Jpn) 1995; 66:361-367.
31. Tomizuka K, Yoshida H, Uejima H, Kugoh H, Sato K, Ohguma A, Hayasaka M, Hanaoka
Deng 9
K, Oshimura M, Ishida I. Functional expression and germline transmission of a human
chromosome fragment in chimaeric mice. Nat Genet 1997; 16:133-143.
32. Sato H, Amagai K, Shimizukawa R, Tamai Y. Stable generation of serum- and feeder-free
embryonic stem cell-derived mice with full germline-competency by using a GSK3 specific
inhibitor. Genesis 2009; 47:414-422.
33. Gubbay J, Collignon J, Koopman P, Capel B, Economou A, Münsterberg A, Vivian N,
Goodfellow P, Lovell-Badge R. A gene mapping to the sex-determining region of the mouse Y
chromosome is a member of a novel family of embryonically expressed genes. Nature 1990;
346:245-250.
34. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, Yamanaka S.
Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 2007;
131:861-872.
35. Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, Tian S, Nie J,
Jonsdottir GA, Ruotti V, Stewart R, Slukvin II, Thomson JA. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines
derived from human somatic cells. Science 2007; 318:1917-1920.
36. Stadtfeld M, Hochedlinger K. Induced pluripotency: history, mechanisms, and applications.
Genes Dev 2010; 24:2239-2263.
37. Urbach A, Benvenisty N. Studying early lethality of 45,XO (Turner's syndrome) embryos
using human embryonic stem cells. PLoS One 2009; 4:e4175.
38. Zhou GB, Meng QG, Li N. In vitro derivation of germ cells from embryonic stem cells in
mammals. Mol Reprod Dev 2010; 77:586-594.
39. Lee J, Kanatsu-Shinohara M, Ogonuki N, Miki H, Inoue K, Morimoto T, Morimoto H,
Ogura A, Shinohara T. Heritable imprinting defect caused by epigenetic abnormalities in mouse
spermatogonial stem cells. Biol Reprod 2009; 80:518-527.
40. Hübner K, Fuhrmann G, Christenson LK, Kehler J, Reinbold R, De La Fuente R, Wood J,
Strauss JF 3rd, Boiani M, Schöler HR. Derivation of oocytes from mouse embryonic stem cells.
Science 2003; 300:1251-1256.
41. Nicholas CR, Haston KM, Grewall AK, Longacre TA, Reijo Pera RR. Transplantation
directs oocyte maturation from embryonic stem cells and provides a therapeutic strategy for
female infertility. Hum Mol Genet 2009; 18:4376-4389.
42. Behringer RR. Human-animal chimeras in biomedical research. Cell Stem Cell 2007; 1:259-
262.
43. Meaburn KJ, Parris CN, Bridger JM. The manipulation of chromosomes by mankind: the
uses of microcell-mediated chromosome transfer. Chromosoma 2005; 114:263-274.
44. O'Doherty A, Ruf S, Mulligan C, Hildreth V, Errington ML, Cooke S, Sesay A, Modino S,
Vanes L, Hernandez D, Linehan JM, Sharpe PT, Brandner S, Bliss TV, Henderson DJ, Nizetic
D, Tybulewicz VL, Fisher EM. An aneuploid mouse strain carrying human chromosome 21 with
Down syndrome phenotypes. Science 2005; 309:2033-2037.