HOMOSEXUALITY AS A SCIENCE SAN MARCOS 
Luis E. Arbaugh Geneticist Biologist
UNMSM
http://luisarbaizaescalante.blogspot.com/
HOMOSEXUALITY
definitions should be based on the essentials and not what is, in general, not particular and in the cause and not the effects, so that will define homosexuality as a specific physiological state, which can respond, sexually and emotionally toward the same anatomical sex. (Savic 2008, Ishai 2006) (Savic 2001), sexual orientation is not a social construction.
Man, woman, homosexual or heterosexual, male and female are biological, not cultural products.
homosexuality and heterosexuality are not mutually exclusive, necessarily.
The physiological condition of homosexuality is a state technically objective and measurable, directly or indirectly. (Savic 2008) (Savic 2001) (Ishai 2006)
The origin of this physiological state before adulthood results from a combination of genetic and environmental factors, remains to be clarified the weight of each of these factors and their role and mechanisms of action.
But this physiological state in the adult is incapable of being removed or altered.
Homosexuality is natural given that commonly occur throughout the animal kingdom.
Homosexuality is normal (biologically speaking) and non-pathological, since this physiological condition, does not affect health or homeostasis of the subject. If a gay gene, this would stop the genetic diversity (such as Red or take saguineo group RH-) as a gene is considered pathological only if it is at a frequency less than 0.001% and normal if it is beyond that frequency. Since homosexuality is around 4% in the phenotype, we can assume that the genotype frequency is the square root of this percentage (about 2%), which leaves it well within normal.
Homosexuality has other more complex dimensions, the result of the interaction of physiological status with other human aspects.
For example, the wearer's mind reacted in different ways to the physiological state, negative positive, and society, giving a dimension of homosexuality also affective and social. But the physiological state
homosexual is the cause first and most essential and universal feature to be homosexual.
This physiological state should not be confused with mechanical sexual response. HOMOSEXUAL
SPECIFIC PHYSIOLOGICAL CONDITION.
must be distinguished from homosexual physiological condition that is specific mechanics of sexual response that is specific and universal (S.-h. Hu, 2008) (Savic 2008) (Ishai 2006) (Savic 2001) (RC Pillard 1998)
Homosexual Condition Specific Physiological
brain structure is allows a homosexual love or fall in love with a person of the same sex.
It is located in the neocortex, stretch zones.
is specific
Mechanical Sexual Response is the brain-genital structure that allows a subject to achieve orgasm by stimulating heterosexual, homosexual or mechanical. It is located in the more primitive brain, not elastic
is nonspecific
The physiological condition homosexual involves a package of various physiological phenomena.
1 .- PHEROMONES. has shown a response to 4,16-androstadien gay-3-one derivative of testosterone (AND) candidate compound to male pheromone.
The answer can be seen in dysmorphic sexual nucleus in the anterior hypothalamus. And in the medial preoptic area / anterior hypothalamus, involved in sexual response.
(Savic 2005, 2008)
2 .- IN LOVE
response is similar to the heterosexual love-romantic, differing only in the anatomical sex of the object of affection.
(SEE APPENDIX I)
The biochemistry of love is different for men and women, homosexuals have a physiological state of love typical of their anatomical sex, so that gay couples have a different physiological dynamics of heterosexual couples
two differences in particular: a.
- In the love of partner Testosterone decreases in men and women increases, reducing libido in men and women increases. In male homosexual couples falling testosterone and libido is mutual, as the increase in mutual lesbian couples. Taking this a different dynamic gay and lesbian couples.
b. - Because men have a template more related to the visual and women mental, based partners training and retention to those terms.
HOMOPHOBIA
is a type of discriminatory behavior directed against homosexuality. Both homosexual persons as impersonal expressions of homosexuality.
origin and may have multiple causes. But generally not in fear, but by abuse from a social advantage.
That led to the disappearance and repression of homosexuality. Or the segregation of homosexuals second role in society.
Like any discriminatory conduct should or produces social gain at the expense of the discriminator discriminated
AUTOHOMOFOBIA
aggression or contempt is to homosexuality from gay people.
The autohomofobia is expressed for example in the way that disqualifies a homophobic homosexual to another auto-calling with the same words with which disparaging disparagingly called discrimination of homosexuals, for example marica maricon, etc., Is another case of psychological mechanism of identification with the aggressor. And reveals the contempt felt for mime as if homosexuals.
This is also shows remarkable self-denigrating and self-punitive of drag queens
Sometimes this self-destructive behavior is covered up with the alleged intention of giving a new meaning to the words but the meaning of words is given by which gives the community and its use. (Wittgenstein 1987), and they play in this derogatory, moreover, if the intention is to neutralize these words (which ah never achieved in the history of languages \u200b\u200bunintentionally) why not use that already exist value neutral?
Genre:
is a cultural construction, typical of every society, learned and completely independent of sexual preference (homosexual or heterosexual) TRANSGENDER
Homosexual with feminine gender role
CISGENERO
Homosexual with gender role
male anatomical sex 
:
is the condition anatomically male or female, mainly resulting from the activity or inactivity of the SRY gene located on chromosome Y. There are only two sexes
anatomical intersex forms can not be considered diseases or other sex but fantasies of both sexes.
It was found that XY women (usually women are XX) have the SRY gene of Y chromosome mutated and inactive. XX men (usually XY) have a working SRY gene inserted somewhere in their genome.
ANTIHOMOFOBIA:
time series of activities aimed to reduce, neutralize or counter the homo phobic. In social terms is a war and confrontation.
GENETICS OF HOMOSEXUALITY estimated between 40% -60% penetrance (participation in determining a hereditary character) in the physiological state homosexual, the rest may be due to environmental causes, not genetic or biological. (Murphy 2005, Bailey 1999;) (Dawood K, 2000.) (RC Pillard, 1981) (RC Pillard. 1982)
has not been re-link the region Xq28 (, Hamer DH. 2005). (DH Hamer ,, 1993) (Hu S, 1995) (Mustanski 2005)
Possible gay genes chromosomes: chromosome 7, 8, and 10
SOLUTION THE PARADOX OF THE GAY GENE
The possible existence of one or more genes gays leads to genetic paradox if these genes predispose to homosexuality, then reduce the multiplication of that in later generations, given that on average gay (human or animal) have fewer children than heterosexuals. The frequency of these genes and the trait predisposing, would decline over time and should be on the same frequency of mutant genes (0, 001% maximum) (Miller EM. 2000)
But it was found that the frequency is much human high (16%) plus remains in the animal kingdom with examples of up to 60%.
this paradox is resolved when considering that this gene carriers would increase the fertility of women. (Camperio. 2004)
There is evidence that fertility increased in female relatives of gay men. (Camperio 2008) (King M, 2005) (F MacIntyre 1993) ALIGNMENT
The alienated person decides to be in some way, and then create, pretend or convince, that is, of course, essentially.
The reasons for the alignment are in search of a social gain. Usually someone who does not need to take pride in the individual, looking for value belongs to group that believes it even more or it should be (race, gender, group, nation, social class etc).
PSEUDONECESARIA DUALITY OF THE MALE-FEMENNINO
exists in the mythical idea of \u200b\u200bmutual necessity and complementarity of male and female, that man needs to be a woman and this man. So being a man is like women and be women like men. Therefore
who likes men (homosexuals) will be a woman.
This misconception also implies a wrong result, that gender is synonymous with sexual orientation and gender plus = sex. Being gay means you have to be effeminate.
These ideas are wrong, first, a woman is not like men, because there are women who like women.
Second, being gay is not synonymous with being transgender because there are no homosexuals transgender, not female (or male gender cisgeneros)
Many people qualify Herrade criticism or rejection of effeminacy (trans-generofóbia) as homophobia, which reveals that identify homosexuality with the feminine gender, sexual orientation, gender = bone wrongly. It would in any case of trans-gender-phobia.
effeminate or TRANSGENERALIDAD:
Two causes of effeminate gay men. All of environmental origin and not genetic or congenital: 1 .-
brain structure. Just as in the retina reflects the world outside observer. In the brain being formed brain structures that reflect the social world. (Wexler 2006)
to the age of 21 individuals can modify or expand their structures brain adapts to new concepts or realities. This explains the difficulty of older people to adapt to other companies to migrate, or understand new ways of thinking. Which would require the construction of new brain structures, something difficult after age 21, in most people. Young people are better able to accomplish it.
One of these social structures and the individual is reflected in his brain and inner ends as necessary and unchangeable, is the image that complements the masculine the feminine, assigned to each part of the pair mutually complementary and necessary for ways of speaking, acting, interacting, etc.
This explains that the gay effeminacy observed in the surrounding society that those men are with women, and how they want to be with men, therefore women should be as they can. They can not adopt the model anatomically change cultural feminine. Adding to that seen in society as it determines a model for gays, who like to be a gay, and adopted that way of being. Moreover, each company offers different models of how to be a gay or should be women, so it shows that gays in the 80s were like the women of the 80s. Or the gay or African Yorkers have different models of how to be gay to obey and imitate, so that cultural diversity is a diversity in imitation or alignment.
Therefore effeminacy is a kind of conservative, not a revolutionary position. Homosexuals are gay or transgender, pretending to be heterosexual.
should add that there is nothing wrong with the genre or as transgender, and if its possible cause (alignment).
I will make a parallel to the line of black in a racist society.
black racism imposes a certain social role, a dancer for example, some auto-black racist, actually accept this imposition and engaged to be good dancers, cutting its further potential. Others reject that imposition
are limiting and be anything they want.
here is not bad to be a dancer, the bad is not free to choose to be. Also
effeminacy in gay men is not bad in itself, but its cause, if this is the lineup.
should be clear that this statement is an opinion of value (better, worse) or moral (bad, good) but rather an assessment of development (more developed less developed).
The emergence of social referents on homosexuality allows new generations to develop an identity cisgericas. 2 .-
MIRROR NEURONS
Mirror neurons make us feel empathy for those who look like us, as well as help them learn behaviors by imitating others (Rizzolatti, 2004) (Dinstein 2008)
allow the child to imitate adults and learn a range of useful behaviors. In the adult help individuals to fit into new environments, that explains why a person can change the way they act, (Dinstein 2008) talk and feel depending on current mode, feel or talk about those around him. The lower the security level or the individual's mental development, it is more conformist and imitator of others. That explains why many gays just get their effeminacy effeminate to be surrounded by friends in their quest to fit in with them.
feel what others feel to the extent that they seem. That's why people feel compassion acceptance or fellowship for which you appear.
That explains the tolerance that exists in underdeveloped societies to effeminate gay men or transgender. Because they are closer to the heterosexual model that they have, as a necessary complement male female. And how shocking and unacceptable that they find the combination male with male.
social rejection towards gays cisgeneros (not effeminate or masculine) and cisgeneros couples is higher than towards homosexuals, being far more radical and even be antagonistic to the concepts of gay stereotypes and corresponding pairs of men and women. The love affair with male male attentive to male-female dichotomy and myths of their need and harmony. But this rejection
more to cisgenero, is cloaked by respect, tolerance and fear that exists toward the male chauvinist society. So the strategy towards couples cisgeneros homophobia is invisibility, while anti-gay strategy is transgender violence, like the one against women.
Longtail
2 .- PRINCIPLES OF DEFINITIONS:
1 .- The fight against homophobia is intended to defend the homosexual, not transgender. Given that transgender is an isolated phenomenon, independent of the homosexual, does not concern the anti-homophobic.
The debate over female or the masculine and positive or negative role of gender roles in society is a heterosexual and not homosexual problem. 2 .-
to homosexual discrimination is more aggressive and intense in Peruvian society to transgender discrimination. Examples of this is that it is more acceptable and conservative backward societies and even effeminate homosexuals and transsexuals transgenders, homosexuals cisgeneros. The aggression against effeminate homosexuals (transgender) is not a feminine hate themselves (that is valued when present in women) but to his homosexuality, his effeminacy is a sign or indicator.
3 .- The effeminacy is in most cases, alignment, al aceptar la invitación de ser socialmente lo que la sociedad quiere que sean los homosexuales.
4.- Es un error la asociación entre homosexualidad y tras generalidad, y al identificar los problemas de los homosexuales con el de transgeneros.
3.- ORIGEN Y CAUSAS DE LA HOMOFÓBIA.
La causa de la homofobía es la competencia social entre los sujetos, los seres humanos usan cualquier excusa y oportunidad para disminuir las posibilidades de los demás y aumentar las propias.
Así que la discriminación en general es un mecanismo que busca la conveniencia y ventaja del discriminador. Reduciendo la del discriminado
La homofóbia no busca segregar el cuerpo de los homosexuales, que en nada are different from heterosexuals, but its social value.
THE THREE STAGES OF THE EMANCIPATION GAY:
The emancipation of discriminated groups are three stages. STAGE
The subject discriminated against is not considered as part of humanity, such as machismo did not consider women human beings. or citizens.
The racism is not considered human slaves or who have soul.
And homophobia is not considered a homosexual as existing or normal human being. SECOND STAGE
There is a social acceptance but as an inferior being. The machismo is acceptable for women but with a second-class role, they are ordered be less rational or more emotional etc.
In the black racism is accepted as part of society if it is engaged in lower activities, sports, arts etc. Homosexuality
A offers a lower social role, being the "crazy", frivolous, funny, dedicated to certain tasks and transgender etc. STAGE
Here the subject before accepting discrimination as well. Not assigned any particular social role or value. At this stage the gays do not have to be in any particular way and can be whatever you want.
In these stages there are two responsibilities, one of the company offering the roles and another in the discrimination that accepts or rebels to them.
In Peru we are in transit from the first to the second stage.
A grades features the LGBT movement, gay model proposed to be accepted as inferior citizens. That explains why they focus on transgender (effeminate gay as a synonym) or in people with HIV (gay as handicapped physically), and the general discourse in their ranks queer (gay as rare), which comes in many levels ideological fanaticism or irrational devotion. Their struggle is against transgenerofóbia more than against homophobia. Luis E. Arbaugh
Geneticist Biologist
National University of San Marcos
http://luisarbaizaescalante.blogspot.com/
BIBLIOGRAFIA
Allen LS, Gorski RA. Sexual orientation and the size of the anterior commissure in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:7199–7202.
Andrea Camperio Ciani,1* Paolo Cermelli,2 and Giovanni Zanzotto3Sexually Antagonistic Selection in Human Male Homosexuality PLoS ONE. 2008; 3(6): e2282.
Berglund H, Lindström P, Savic I. Brain response to putative pheromones in lesbian women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:8269–8274.
Bailey JM, Pillard RC, Dawood K, Miller MB, Farrer LA, et al. A family history study of male sexual orientation using three independent samples. Behav Genet. 1999;29:79–86.
Blanchard R. Quantitative and theoretical analyses of the relation between older brothers and homosexuality in men. J Theor Biol. 2004;230:173–178.
Bobrow D, Bailey JM. Is male homosexuality maintained via kin selection? Evol Hum Behav. 2001;22:361–368.
Bockting W, Benner A, Coleman E. Gay and Bisexual Identity Development Among Female-to-Male Transsexuals in North America: Emergence of a Transgender Sexuality. Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Mar 28.
Bocklandt S, Horvath S, Vilain E, Hamer DH.Hum Genet. 2006 Feb;118(6):691-4. Epub 2005 Dec 21 Extreme skewing of X chromosome inactivation in mothers of homosexual men
Bruce E. Wexler Brain and Culture: Neurobiology, Ideology, and Social Change The MIT Press; 1 edition (May 5, 2006)
Camperio-Ciani, A.; Corna, F.; Capiluppi, C .Evidence for maternally inherited factors favouring male homosexuality and promoting female fecundity Proceedings of the Royal Society. Biological sciences 2004 Vol. 271 Núm. 1554 pg – 2217
Camperio Ciani A, Iemmola F, Blecher S. Genetic factors increase fecundity in female maternal relatives of bisexual men as of homosexuals. Sex Med. 2008 In press.
Camperio Ciani A, Iemmola F, Lombardi L. Male homosexuality partly correlates with an increase of androphilia and fecundity in females from the maternal line. Preprint. 2008
Dawkins R. The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1976.
Dawood K, Pillard RC, Horvath C, Revelle W, Bailey JM. Familial aspects of male homosexuality. Arch Sex Behav. 2000;29:155–163.
Dinstein I, Gardner JL, Jazayeri M, Heeger DJ. Executed and observed movements have different distributed representations in human aIPS. J Neurosci. 2008 Oct 29;28(44):11231-9
DuPree MG, Mustanski BS, Bocklandt S, Nievergelt C, Hamer DH. A candidate gene study of CYP19 (aromatase) and male sexual orientation. Behav Genet. 2004 May;34(3):243-50.
Foerster K, Coulson T, Sheldon BC, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH, et al. Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer. Nature. 2007;447:1107–1110.
Garcia-Falgueras A, Swaab DF. A sex difference in the hypothalamic uncinate nucleus: relationship to gender identity. Brain. 2008 Dec;131(Pt 12):3132-46. Epub 2008 Nov 2.
Gavrilets S, Rice WR. Genetic models of homosexuality: generating testable predictions. Proc Roy Soc London B. 2006;273:3031–3038.
Getz WM. Invasion and maintenance of alleles that influence mating and parental success. J Theor Biol. 1993;162:515–537
Hamer D, Hu S, Magnuson V, Hu N, Pattatucci A. Male sexual orientation and genetic evidence Science 1993;262:2065.
Hamer DH, Hu S, Magnuson VL, Hu N, Pattatucci AM A linkage between DNA markers on the X chromosome and male sexual orientation. . Science. 1993 Jul 16;261(5119):321-7.
Hamer DH, Copeland P. The science of desire: the search for the gay gene and biology of behavior. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster; 1994.
Hu S, Pattatucci AML, Patterson C, Li L, Fulkner DW, et al. Linkage between sexual orientation and chromosome Xq28 in males but not in females. Nature Genetics. 1995;11:248–256.
Hutchinson GE. A speculative consideration of certain forms of sexual selection in men. Am Nat. 1959;93:81–91.
Ishai Kranz F, A. Face perception is modulated by sexual preference. Curr Biol. 2006;16:63–68.
(Ishai 2006)
Fisher Helen E., The Anatomy of Love, Random House, 1993
Judson O. Dr. Tatiana's sex advice to all creation. London: Vintage; 2003.
King M, Green J, Osborn DPJ, Arkell J, Hetherton J, et al. Family size in white gay and heterosexual men. Arch Sex Behav. 2005;34:117–122.
King M, Green J, Osborn DPJ, Arkell J, Hetherton J, et al. Family size in white gay and heterosexual men. Arch Sex Behav. 2005;34:117–122
Kinsey AC, Pomeroy WR, Martin CE. Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1948
Iemmola F, Camperio Ciani A. New evidences of genetic factors influencing sexual orientation in men: female fecundity increase in the maternal line. Arch Sex Behav. 2008 In press.
Lyons MJ, et al. A twin study of sexual behavior in men. Arch Sex Behav. 2004;33:129–136.
McCormick CM, Witelson SF. Functional cerebral asymmetry and sexual orientation in men and women. Behav Neurosci. 1994;108:525–531.
McFadden D, Champlin CA. Comparison of auditory evoked potentials in heterosexual, homosexual, and bisexual males and females. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2000;1:89–99.
MacIntyre F, Estep KW. Sperm competition and the persistence of genes for male homosexuality. Biosystems. 1993;31:223–233.
Martin OY, Hosken DJ. The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict. Nature. 2003;423:979–982
McKnight J. Straight science? Homosexuality, evolution and adaptation. London: Routledge; 1997.
Miller JW, et al. Gender differences in handedness and speech lateralization related to early neurologic insults. Neurology. 2005;65:1974–1975.
Miller EM. Homosexuality, birth order, and evolution: Toward an equilibrium reproductive economics of homosexuality. Arch Sex Behav. 2000;29:1–34
Muscarella F. The evolution of homoerotic behavior in humans. J Homosex. 2000;40:51–
Mustanski BS, Dupree MG, Nievergelt CM, Bocklandt S, Schork NJ, Hamer DH A genomewide scan of male sexual orientation.. Hum Genet. 2005
Mar;116(4):272-8. Epub 2005 Jan 12.
.LeVay S, Hamer DH Evidence for a biological influence in male homosexuality.. Sci Am. 1994 May;270(5):44-9.
Parker GA, Partridge L. Sexual conflict and speciation. Phil Trans R Soc Lond Ser B. 1998;353:261–274
Pattatucci AML. Molecular investigations into complex behavior: lessons from sexual orientation studies. Hum Biol. 1998;70:367–386.
Pillard RC, Poumadere J, Carretta RA. A family study of sexual orientation. Arch Sex Behav. 1982;11:511–520.
Pillard RC, Poumadere J, Carretta RA. Is homosexuality familial? A review, some data, and a suggestion. Arch Sex Behav. 1981;10:465–475.
Pischedda A, Chippindale AK. Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection. PloS biology. 2006;4:2099–2103.
Rahman Q, Cockburn A, Govier E. A comparative analysis of functional cerebral asymmetry in lesbian women, heterosexual women, and heterosexual men. Arch Sex Behav. 2007 Jan 6; doi: Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review in Neuroscience, 27, 169-92.
Reeve HK, Pfenning DW. Genetic biases for showy males: are some genetic systems especially conducive to sexual selection? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:1089–1094
Rice G, Anderson C, Risch N, Ebers G. Male homosexuality: absence of linkage to microsatellite markers at Xq28. Science. 1999;284:665–667.
Rice WR, Holland B. The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE) and the intraspecific Red Queen. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1997;41:1–10.
Rice WR. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature. 1996;361:232–234.
Rice W R, Holland B. The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and the intraspecific. Red Queen Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1997;41:1–10.
Savic Ivanka, Berglund Hans, and Lindström Per, Brain response to putative pheromones in homosexual men Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA April 4, 2005
Savic Ivanka * and Per Lindström PET and MRI show differences in cerebral asymmetry and functional connectivity between homo- and heterosexual subjects Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA. June 16, 2008,
Savic Ivanka and Lindström Per PET and MRI show differences in cerebral asymmetry and functional connectivity between homo- and heterosexual subjects Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. July 8; 105(27): 9403–9408 2008
Savic I. Processing of odorous signals in humans. Brain Res Bull;54:307–312. 2001
Savic I, Berglund H, Lindström P. Brain response to putative pheromones in homosexual men. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:7356–73615.
S.-h. Hu, N. Wei, Q.-D. Wang, L.-q. Yan, E.-Q. Wei, M.-M. Zhang, J.-B. Hu, M.-l. Huang, W.-h. Zhou and Y. Xu Patterns of Brain Activation during Visually
Savolainen V, Lehmann L. Genetics and bisexuality. Nature. 2007;445:158–159
Evoked Sexual Arousal Differ between Homosexual and Heterosexual Men
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 3, 2008
Swaab DF. Sexual differentiation of the human brain: relevance for gender identity, transsexualism and sexual orientation. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2004;19:301–312.
Timothy F Murphy The search for the gay gene BMJ. 2005 April 30; 330(7498): 1033
Trivers RL. Parent-offspring conflict. Am Zoo. 1974;14:249–264.
VanderLaan DP, Vasey PL. Mate retention behavior of men and women in heterosexual and homosexual relationships. Arch Sex Behav. 2007 Published online.
Vasey PL, VanderLaan DP. Birth order and male androphilia in Samoan fa'afafine. Proc Roy Soc London B. 2007;274:1437–1442.
Wegesin DJ. Relation between language lateralisation and spatial ability in gay and straight women and men. Laterality. 1998;3:227–239
Wilson EO. Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1975.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig: Tractatus logico-philosophicus (traducción de Jacobo Muñoz e Isidoro Reguera). Madrid, Alianza, 1987
