heard a few days ago involving a literary commentator for today on the radio doing "analysis" of the last work of JK Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Goblet of death "yet the same" commentator claimed not having read the book. Outside the book whatsoever, I think very little professional someone who can present to comment without having read the book and more so if the book is easy reading.
I have heard many times that the Hary Potter series is "very commercial "," minor literature ", etc. The irony is that it always says the only thing that frustrated artists do not support is the success that if they have succeeded.
commercial What if?. Yes, yes it is. But for those who have a fanatical cult thinking that reading a book "must change your life" or that the book always "treasure of knowledge" you may be disappointed. From the beginning it was said that books are entertaining and that alone. Some of the positive features in the writing of JK Rowling in my opinion are: agility, intriguing curiosity and not feeling writer classics.
The above commenter argued that it was excessive to say that Rowling had Dickensonianos touches, which makes me think that the commentator has not only read Rowling but also to Dickens. Nobody said that Rowling was Dickens, but the structure of the nineteenth century English novel is present and above all the shadows of the author of "The Pickwick papers."
The above commenter argued that it was excessive to say that Rowling had Dickensonianos touches, which makes me think that the commentator has not only read Rowling but also to Dickens. Nobody said that Rowling was Dickens, but the structure of the nineteenth century English novel is present and above all the shadows of the author of "The Pickwick papers."
mavideñas The constant references, the use of orphans, the constant use of the family as nostalgia, the retrospective history of the characters back into the main text and the input of multiple characters are implausible denial. But it is like denying the influence of the great Latin American writers (Borges, Cortazar, etc.) in the Latin American authors writing today.
The structure of the top 5 novels of the series is cut with scissors first, but in the last two (The Prince and Deathly Hallows) the structure is broken by slightly more entertaining reading. If one is a pseudo-imperialist who believes that anything that involves mass culture is insulting and read while waiting is a classic psychological depth and narrative I think I could ever read in his life Tolstoy.
And if the pretext of mediocre literary commentators is that there is no translation Text in English I recommend these links
http://proyectodh.blogspot.com/
The structure of the top 5 novels of the series is cut with scissors first, but in the last two (The Prince and Deathly Hallows) the structure is broken by slightly more entertaining reading. If one is a pseudo-imperialist who believes that anything that involves mass culture is insulting and read while waiting is a classic psychological depth and narrative I think I could ever read in his life Tolstoy.
And if the pretext of mediocre literary commentators is that there is no translation Text in English I recommend these links
http://proyectodh.blogspot.com/
Dream and smile 
